For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a good friend - my really own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (great title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a couple of basic triggers about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of composing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It may have surpassed Janet's prompts in looking at information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a strange, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my feline (I have no pets). And scientific-programs.science there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, king-wifi.win he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, considering that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to generate them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody creating one in anyone's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer specifying that it is fictional, garagesale.es created by AI, and designed "solely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the company, wiki.rrtn.org but Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is meant as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get sold even more.

He hopes to broaden his range, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and perhaps offering an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human clients.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are talking about data here, we in fact imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for imaginative functions should be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without approval must be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely powerful but let's build it ethically and fairly."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI designers to utilize creators' content on the web to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and destroying the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly against eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a great deal of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its best performing industries on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A government representative stated: "No move will be made till we are definitely positive we have a practical plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them certify their content, access to premium material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a nationwide data library consisting of public information from a large range of sources will also be made readily available to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector needed to share details of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are launched.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a number of lawsuits versus AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it ought to be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

As for me and wiki.vst.hs-furtwangen.de a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for bigger tasks. It is complete of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts since it's so long-winded.

But given how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm uncertain for how long I can stay positive that my substantially slower human writing and modifying skills, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in global innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters around the globe.

Outside the UK? Register here.