For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a friend - my really own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant reviews.

Yet it was entirely composed by AI, with a few simple prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an intriguing read, ai-db.science and very funny in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of writing, but it's also a bit repeated, and very verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repeated hallucination in the type of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of business online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, considering that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anyone producing one in anyone's name, consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book includes a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, developed by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and joy".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, but Mr Mashiach worries that the item is meant as a "customised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He intends to widen his range, producing different categories such as sci-fi, and possibly using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - offering AI-generated goods to human consumers.

It's also a bit scary if, garagesale.es like me, you write for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out similar material based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are speaking about information here, we in fact mean human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI companies to regard creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for creative purposes need to be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without authorization ought to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be extremely effective but let's develop it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and dents America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize creators' content on the internet to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, journalists and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise highly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million tasks and a lot of delight," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its finest performing markets on the vague promise of growth."

A government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a useful plan that delivers each of our goals: increased control for ideal holders to assist them accredit their content, access to high-quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI plan, a national data library consisting of public information from a large range of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less guideline.

This comes as a number of lawsuits against AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the web without their approval, and pl.velo.wiki utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of aspects which can make up reasonable usage - it's not a . But the AI sector christianpedia.com is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training information and whether it must be paying for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it developed its innovation for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I truly desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It is complete of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts because it's so long-winded.

But given how quickly the tech is evolving, I'm unsure for how long I can remain confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in international technology, with analysis from BBC reporters around the world.

Outside the UK? Register here.